It is our fifth day, and the itinerary of the day includes a
visit to Swire Coca-Cola
Hong Kong, Hong Kong Monetary Authority and Hong Kong Housing Authority.
After enjoying a delicious dim sum breakfast, we proceeded to
Swire Coca Cola factory to start on our guided learning journey.
Swire Coca-Cola HK Limited is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Swire Beverages Limited and is the leading soft
drink bottler in Hong Kong. It operates 17 production lines and produces more
than 64 million unit cases annually. Swire is a highly diversified global
group. Many of their core businesses can be found within the Asia Pacific
region, where traditionally Swire's operations have centred on Hong Kong and
Mainland China. Within Asia, Swire's activities come under the group's publicly
quoted arm, Swire Pacific Ltd. Their objective is to advance a framework in which their packaging is no
longer seen as waste, but instead as a valuable resource for future use.
Swire’s packaging delivers value to consumers by meeting their needs for
convenience, portability and functionality.
The company’s tour
guide, Mr Eric, brought us around the building and explained how the company
operates. Upon viewing the bottling and packing process of the cans and bottles
of drinks, what struck us immediately was how capital intensive the plant is.
It harnessed technology (such as capping machines) and requires very few
workers in the production lines. In fact, most of the workers are concentrated
in the marketing and administration departments.
We learnt that Swire
Coca-Cola Hong Kong is a bottling plant which bottled the Coca-Cola formula
from America. This means that Swire has control over the way it bottled the
drink. In order to reduce cost of production to maximise profits, Swire
imported special plastic bottles from Taiwan that are a few times smaller than
what we see at the supermarket. These bottles are then blown up to
full size (as shown in the picture below) at
Swire bottling plant before they undergo stringent sterilization and finally
filled with the beverage.
This bottling
technology save space on importing the raw material (plastic bottles), reducing
shipping cost which takes into account the volume of the cargo. This reduces
cost of production!
Swire also taps on the
environmental consciousness of people in Hong Kong to reduce its cost of
production by having an extensive recycling programme all over the city. Swire
invented recycling machines to collect used bottles, cans as well as glass
bottles.
These are then processed and returned to
its bottling plants to be sterilized and filled with beverages again. According
to Mr Eric, Swire Coca-Cola Hong Kong currently holds 80-90% market share of
the beverages market in Hong Kong. This implies that it enjoys significant
economies of scale. For example, bulk purchase of plastic bottles alone enables
large savings of cost. To tap on this, Swire also invented its own brand of
beverage-Bonaqua, a type of mineral water.
Hence, with many common raw
materials needed across the different beverages Swire bottled, the firm is able
to enjoy relatively lower material costs.
Although the firm holds
significant market share in Hong Kong, it is evidenced that Swire continues to
engage in product differentiation. For example, it uses American’s Coke
Super Chill technology that chills the drink on the inside instantly when the
bottle cap is untwisted, allowing consumers to enjoy the original taste of icy
Coca-Cola chilled at minus 6 degrees Celsius. With the SuperChill
refrigerators, consumers get to enjoy icy beverages by Coca-Cola, anytime,
anywhere in Hong Kong. This technology is so far unique only to Coca-Cola. This
is where cross-elasticity of demand can be applied where the demand for
Coca-Cola beverages will only fall by less than proportionate when the price of
beverages by competitors such as Pepsi falls.
Next, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) was our second
pit stop of the day. Upon entering the building, we were greeted with security
guards watching our every move. This definitely gave us a sense of vigilance
and self-awareness, reminding us to behave appropriately. Soon we were wholly
engaged to the vast information presented in front of us.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority
was established on 1 April 1993 as Hong Kong’s central banking institution. The
HKMA’s main functions and responsibilities are governed by the Exchange Fund
Ordinance and the Banking Ordinance and are set out in the Exchange of Letters
between the Financial Secretary and the Monetary Authority of 25 June 2003.
The HKMA has 4 main functions:
- To maintain currency stability within the framework of the Linked
Exchange Rate system
- To promote the stability and integrity of the financial system,
including the banking system
- To help maintain Hong Kong’s status as an international financial
center, including the maintenance and development of Hong Kong’s financial
infrastructure
- To manage the Exchange Fund
The HKMA maintains Hong Kong’s
Linked Exchange Rate system, under which the Hong Kong dollar is linked to the
US dollar at the rate of HK7.80=US$1. It supervises one of the world’s largest
and most diverse banking centers and manages US$317.3 billion in official
reserves, in the Exchange Fund (up to the end of December 2012). Lastly, it
supervises and develops one of the most advanced efficient financial
infrastructures in the world.
In the past, Hong Kong used
precious metals as a form of payment, with silver and gold being the standard
mode of transactions. As years progressed, the government of Hong Kong faced a
pressing problem. The value of precious metals became higher than the actual
coin value which made people to melt them and us it at a higher price. As a
measure, the government used coins with cheaper metals to protect their
currency and its economy. With years of colonization by the British and
relations with China and Taiwan, the Sterling Pound, Ren Min Bi and Tai Bi
officially became a legal tender in Hong Kong.
As Hong Kong started to rise as
one of the 4 Asian tigers, it was paramount for them to protect their currency
from counterfeits. A wide array of measures was undertaken to achieve this.
Some of them was the advanced watermark, colour changing metallic strip, value
imprint, value code and specialized paper with 100% pure cotton.
We also learnt about how the
banknotes are made. Firstly, the banknote paper is specially manufactured with
watermark and colour changing windowed metallic thread which is delivered to
the Hong Kong Noted Printing Private Limited. To provide design, both sides of the banknote are printed simultaneously
using litho printed. Silk-screen
printing is also applied. It is used for the printing of dynamic colour
changing pattern and iridescent image. Advanced intaglio printing provides an
enhanced embossed feel. Sheets will then
go through a sheet examination. Each note of the sheets is individually
numbered and printed with fluorescent images with additional security features.
Printed sheets are then cut into single notes. An automatic Banknote Processing
System is used for the final quality check of the banknotes.
After the final
quality check, single notes are strapped in packets which will be stored in a
vault while awaiting collection by the note-issuing banks. Printed notes will
then be transported to the vaults of note-issuing banks for storage.
Up to this
stage, the banknotes are not considered as issued. Banknotes are issued by the
three note-issuing banks, against the Government’s Exchange Rate system.
Certificates of indebtedness are issued by the note-issuing banks to this
effect. On their return to the note-issuing banks, used banknotes are redeemed
against payment from the Governor’s Exchange Fund in US dollars. These redeemed
banknotes are considered unissued banknotes held in stock. Used notes are
screened by machines at the note-issuing banks to sort out worn, damaged or
soiled notes. Unfit notes are then shredded and sent for landfill.
Mrs Chan also shared with us on
the monetary policies adopted by Singapore and other countries. We were given a
preview of what we will be learning next year on macroeconomics problems and
policies. As this is a self-visited tour, we did not have the chance to find
out what monetary policies Hong Kong adopted. However, it certainly triggers
our interest in the macro aspects of economics.
Last but not least, we visited the
Hong Kong Housing Authority. Established in 1973, the HA develops and
implements a public housing programme with the main objective of meeting the
housing needs of low income families.
Approximately 30% of the Hong Kong
population lives in public rental housing units, with 52% living in private
housing. The HA plans, builds, manages and maintains different types of public
housing, including rental housing estates, interim housing estates and transit
centres. Currently, 720,000 public rental housing are for lease, majority of
them situated at the Kowloon Peninsular. 60% of these tenants living in these
public houses have a monthly income of HK$1,500 (approximately S$9,000).
Housing in Hong Kong is in the
form a merit good. It is viewed by the government as having substantial private
benefits for the individuals themselves. However, it gives rise to the problem
of income inequity where low-income households are not able to afford housing,
leading to overcrowding (underconsumption of proper unit) and homelessness.
Thus, in response to the aspirations of the low and middle income families to
buy their own homes, the Housing Authority has come up with 2 policies – Home
Ownership Scheme (HOS) and the Tenants Purchase Scheme (TPS). The HOS aims at
helping first time home buyers, with a monthly household income below
HK$40,000, to purchase flats at an affordable price. The eligibility to
purchase the houses is that one must have an income of less than HK$8,800
(S$52,800). The prices of the HOS flats will also be set with reference to
their mortgage repayment ability. On the other hand, the TPS was introduced to
enable families living in rental housing to buy their flats at a cheaper rate
over the next 10 years. Under this scheme, flat prices are given a further
discount of 60% on purchase within the first year, which is as low as 12% of
the market value.
On top of that, the Government
has also implemented the Home Purchase Loan Scheme (HPLS), Mortgage Subsidy
Scheme (MSS) as well as the Buy or Rent Option (BRO) to meet the ever
increasing demand for housing. Interest free loans and subsidies are provided
to lower the costs of consumption, causing the consumer to internalise the
external benefits and hence increasing consumption to the socially efficient
level. Moreover, subsidies make housing cheaper and affordable for the
low-income households, reducing the inequity problem.
Efforts were made to enhance the
sustainability of the housing works by incorporating green concepts into the
planning, design and management of the public rental housing. 57 states has
been redeveloped and revitalised so far. Initiatives such as micro climate
studies and wind and solar panels installation, seek to increase the use of
renewable energy to achieve sustainable development. With the use of computerized simulation models, the local climate can be
optimized to enhance wind environment of the site, natural ventilation and
daylight for the domestic flats, thermal comfort of external areas and energy
efficiency. A pilot grid-connected mono-crystalline silicon PV system at Lam
Tin Estate has been in operation since August 2009. Its power output can cater for part of the electricity
demand of the estate’s communal facilities. What’s
more, there would be free Wifi located in almost every part of these new
housing schemes! All these would increase the quality of life of these tenants
and the general standard of living in Hong Kong will be tremendously enhanced.
Should we, as Singaporeans feel
fortunate for our affordable and spacious housing as compared to the tiny exorbitantly-priced shoebox apartments in
chopstick-like skyscrapers in Hong Kong? We can make a comparison between both
countries before we draw further conclusions.
Firstly, in
terms of density, less than 7% of Hong Kong’s land is designated for
residential use, and woodlands, grasslands and wetlands constitutes 67% of the
city’s 1,108 square kilometres. As compared to Singapore, 14% of its land is
allocated for housing purposes. Secondly, in terms of pricing, under the HOS
scheme as mentioned above, the prices of new HOS flats will be set in
accordance with the mortgage repayment ability of eligible households. For
example, the price of a new HOS flat with a saleable area of 400 to 500 sq ft
will fall in the range of HK$1.5 million to HK$2 million (approximately
S$250000 to around S$330000). In
terms of affordability, it will take a household with an annual income of
HK$300,000 (S$50000) which is approximately five years to pay off its loan
using all of its annual income.
Whereas in Singapore, citizens are eligible to
utilise the Central Provident Fund (CPF) which is a compulsory comprehensive savings plan where the employer
contributes 16% of the employee's monthly gross salary and the employee
contributes 20% of his monthly gross salary. For example, Singaporeans are able
to use the amount available (eg. $100,000) in the Ordinary Account to pay off
the loan amount of the HDB flat (eg. $500,000). Therefore, this lowers the loan
amount and monthly installment citizens are required to pay, making it more
affordable to purchase housing in Singapore in comparison to Hong Kong. Thirdly, in terms of rental, about 2.1
million people live in Public Rental Housing (PRH) flats in Hong Kong. PRH rent, inclusive of management and maintenance
costs, is reviewed every two years and adjusted according to PRH household
income. As of March 2012, PRH monthly rent ranged from HK$260 to HK$3,520 (S$43
to S$590). On the other hand, in 2011, about 2% of Singapore’s population
resided in rented flats. HDB only provides subsidized rental for 1 or 2 room
flats. Rent varies from S$26 to S$275 depending on household income and flat type.
Households that wish to rent 3-room flats have to go to the open market, where
rental for 3-room flat ranges from S$1,630 to S$2,300.
All in all, the
trip to the Housing Authority was an enriching experience with a deeper
understanding on how the Hong Kong government allocates housing targeted at the
lower income households. The various schemes implemented had benefitted and
help to curb the prevalent housing problem. However, there is still an unabated
demand for housing in Hong Kong, due to the lack of government resources for
identifying and developing residential sites.
This marks the end of day 5 as we
proceed on to the last day of our learning journey in Hong Kong!